SOCIAL ACTOR DOMINATION IN TAGAR.ID’S MINANGKABAU LANGUAGE GOSPEL APPLICATION NEWS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v9i1.4574Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, socio-cognitive, socio-culturalAbstract
This study aims to describe the dominance of social actor contained in the Tagar. Id's Minangkabau language Gospel application news. The researcher uses van Dijk's view in showing the relationship between social cognition and social actor in mass media's news. The researcher also uses Fairclough's socio-cultural approach in offering the relationship of discourse observed and socio-cultural perspective in the report. Thus, the researcher applies a qualitative approach with van Dijk's socio-cognitive and Fairclough's socio-cultural approach as an analytical knife. The study result indicates the person scheme and event scheme domination in the Tagar. Id's Minangkabau language Gospel application news. The two schemes play an essential role in describing Irwan Prayitno's figure as West Sumatera Governor through the Minangkabau socio-cultural reality. In van Dijk's point of view, social cognition is a form of effort in examining an event or events based on the characters' involvement in the news text. The figure of Irwan Prayitno as the governor of West Sumatra becomes a particular interpretation process for Tagar. Id journalist in producing news by analyzing the leadership form of Irwan Prayitno and the event that happened in Minangkabau community as details of Irwan Prayitno's profile, the socio-cultural reality of the Minangkabau community, and the reasons for rejecting the Minangkabau language Gospel application.
References
Adlpour, Roghayeh., & Eslamieh, Razieh. (2018). Positive Self-Presentation and Negative Other-Presentation in Farsi Translation of Hard Choices. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 6(3), 32—40.
Ahmadvand, M. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis An Introduction to Major Approaches. Dinamika Bahasa Dan Budaya, 5(1), 82—90. https//doi.org/10.35315/bb.v5i1.382
Aini, Nurul., & Widodo, Pratomo. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Bombing Attack News An Analysis of Teun A. van Dijk Model. 2nd International Conference of Communication Science Research (ICCSR 2018), 165, 226—230. https//doi.org/10.2991/iccsr - 18.2018.49
Amoussou, Franck., & Allagbe, Ayodele A. (2018). Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 6(1), 11—18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2347 - 3134.0601002.
Augoustinos, Martha., & Walker, Iain. (1995). Social Cognition An Integrated Introduction. Sage Publication.
Furchan, Arif. (1998). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
KBBI. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Kamus versi online/daring (dalam jaringan). July 24, 2021. https//kbbi.web.id/
Nazir, Moh. (2009). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Norman, Fairclough. (1998) Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman.
Oyeleye, A. Lekan., & Hunjo, Henry. (2013). A Critical Discourse Review of Resistance Consciousness in The Language and Ideology of Social Change Project in Wole Soyinka’s Political Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(2), 82-97.
Podesva, Robert J., & Sharma, Devyani. (2013). Research Method in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Tagar. Id. 2020, June 5. Irwan Prayitno, Gubernur Penolak Injil Bahasa Minang. Tagar. Id. Juli 24, 2021. https://www.tagar.id/irwan-prayitno-gubernur-penolak-injil-bahasa-minang
Van Dijk. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
________(1988). News Analyisis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
________(1993). Elite Discourse and Racism. Sage Publication.
________(1994). Discourse and Cognition in Society. Cambridge Polity Press.
________(2004). Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates. John Benjamins.
