Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia
Kata Kunci:
Anti-corruption agencies, Indonesia, MalaysiaAbstrak
This research examines the comparison of anti-corruption agencies in Indonesia and Malaysia as a response to the detrimental global issue of corruption, which affects social, economic, and political spheres. Using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, data were gathered through searching for relevant articles and journals. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) of Indonesia, established in 2003, plays a crucial role in combating corruption in Indonesia, with main tasks including investigation, prosecution, and preventive functions. Meanwhile, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), formed in 2009, is an independent agency with a broad mandate to investigate and prosecute corrupt practices. Although these agencies have different roles, both aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and effectiveness in enforcing anti-corruption laws. This study also highlights the challenges and changes in the monitoring systems and the evolution of anti-corruption agencies in both countries, providing a comprehensive overview of anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Referensi
Fajrianto. (2023). Mengurai Polemik Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pusaran Pandemi Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, 8(1), 29–46.
Fitrah, A., Dapang, M., & Ridwan. (2023). Analisis Upaya Pemerintah Dalam Menekan Angka Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Bela Negara UPN Veteran Jakarta, 1(1), 36–46.
Ghani, R. H. A., Hamid, A. S. bin A., Paidi, Z. Bin, Ratakrishnan, M. A., Mamat, R. B., & Yeyeng, A. T. (2021). Hubungan Kontemporer Malaysia–Indonesia: Tahap Pengetahuan Dan Pemahaman Gen X Dan Y Malaysia. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 9(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v9i1a8
Ginting, Y. P., Ikbar, A. F., Putri, D. E., Aisy, G. R., & Dawe, R. P. (2023). Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Mengenai Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Negara Indonesia dan Negara Malaysia Berdasarkan Sistem Hukumnya. Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, 2(6), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpws.v2i6.383
Kusuma, R. (2022). Perbandingan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia Dengan Lembaga Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Negara Singapura, Hongkong dan Malaysia. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 7(1), 71–83. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/ubelaj/article/view/12554%0Ahttps://ejournal.unib.ac.id/ubelaj/article/download/12554/11370
Munawaroh, N. (2021). Perbandingan Sistem Pengawasan Lembaga Antikorupsi Di Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(3), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art6
Rahmiati, Saputra, T., Nurhafni, & Sobih, M. (2021). Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia, Singapura Dan Hongkong. Jurnal JUPISI, 1(1), 1–7. https://eksishum.untara.ac.id/index.php/eksishum/article/view/18
Setiadi, W. (2018). Korupsi Di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan, dan Upaya Pemberantasan, serta Regulasi). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(3), 249–262.
Setiawan, I., & Jesaja, C. P. (2022). Analisis Perilaku Korupsi Aparatur Pemerintah Di Indonesia (Studi pada Pengelolaan Bantuan Sosial Di Era Pandemi Covid-19). Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v4i2.2744
Suhendra, A. (2023). Perbandingan Sistem Kewenangan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Antara Indonesia Dengan Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum (JIMHUM), 3(2023), 457–468.
Suprihanto, E., Utama, J., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2023). Reformulasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif Kepolisian Menghadapi Korupsi Sebagai Ancaman Perang Proksi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 204–219.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Prosiding
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
