Perbandingan Reformasi Birokrasi Pelayanan Pajak Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia Studi Kasus : Prosedur Dalam Pembayarah Pajak

Penulis

  • M. Aditya Darma Saputra Universitas Putera Batam
  • Timbul Dompak Universitas Putera Batam

Kata Kunci:

Bureaucracy, Reform, Tax Services

Abstrak

This study compares the tax administration bureaucracy reform between Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on tax payment procedures. Through comparative analysis, this research evaluates the measures taken by both countries to improve their tax administration systems. Indonesia and Malaysia have implemented various initiatives, including the use of information technology, enhanced transparency, and a focus on tax education to enhance efficiency and taxpayer compliance. Although both countries have differences in political and cultural contexts, they share similarities in efforts to reform tax bureaucracy. This research utilizes qualitative research with a literature review. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the tax and public administration fields to understand the latest developments and challenges in efforts to improve tax services

Referensi

Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709

Ariffin, M., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2022). Sistem Perpajakan Di Indonesia. Serina IV Untar, 2(8), 523–534.

Hartoko, S. (2016). Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 (Studi Kasus Pada PT Grazindo Asia Jakarta). Jurnal Lentera Akuntansi, 2(2), 34–47.

Kristanti, D., Kardini, N. L., Sucandrawati, N. L. K. A. S., Hendrik, Alaslan, A., Harto, B., Hidayati, M., Suprianto, Ashriana, A. N., Irawan, B., & Astari, A. A. E. (2023). Etika Bisnis (D. E. Putri (ed.); 1st ed., Issue 30 January). PT. GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI.

Nasution, H. F. (2016). Instrumen Penelitian Dan Urgensinya Dalam Penelitian Kuantatif. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 5(1), 1689–1699.

Noor, A., Radiansyah, A., Selfiana, Ishak, R. P., Hakim, C., Rijal, S., Harto, B., Tinambunan, A. P., Rustiawan, I., Purwatmini, N., Parlina, L., Arta, D. N. C., Khamaludin, Napisah, S., & Hendriana, T. I. (2023). Human Resource Management (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia) (Sepriano & Efitra (eds.); Pertama). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Sinaga, N. A. (2016). Pemungutan Pajak Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 7(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v7i1.128

Sugiyono. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. (cetakan ke). Bandung Alfabeta.

Thohari, A. A. (2018). Epistemologi Pajak, Prespektif Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 8(1), 1–10

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2024-09-18

Cara Mengutip

Saputra, M. A. D. ., & Dompak, T. . (2024). Perbandingan Reformasi Birokrasi Pelayanan Pajak Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia Studi Kasus : Prosedur Dalam Pembayarah Pajak. Prosiding, 6, 216–225. Diambil dari https://forum.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/9337

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama

1 2 3 4 > >>