THE REFLECTION OF SOCIAL ACTIVITIES AND MARRIAGE LIFE OF BRITISH SOCIETY IN 19TH CENTURY AS SEEN IN EMMA BY JANE AUSTEN
Abstrak
This research discusses the application of Sociology of Literature theory proposed by Allan Swingwood which proposed that literary work is a social document which has the reflection of the situation of people in society at the certain time. In this research the writer analyses the novel Emma written by Jane Austen published in 1816. Here, the writer analyses the social activity and marriage life in society. This research is qualitative research by using descriptive method. Data is gained by library research method and other sources taken from web. In this research, the data is analysed based on its relationship with the purpose of the research both instrinsic and extrinsic element in literary work. After comparing the social history of the real condition of British society in 19th century with the plot story in novel “Emma’ by Jane Austen, the writer found that visiting and ball are the social activities which are commonly done by British society in 19th century. The writer also concludes that social class has a close relationship with marriage where it can increase someone’s social status in society.
Referensi
Bodgan, Robert C and Sari Knopp Biklen. Qualitative Research For Education: An Introduction to theory and Method : Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 1982.
Brookes, H F and C E Frankael, Life in Britain. London: Heinmann Educational Books, 1982
Butler, Marilyn. A Note on the Text; Austen’s “Emma”. David Campbell Publisher. 2002
Craig, Hardin, A History of English Literature. Vol 4 : New York. The Crowel Coller Publishing Company. 1962
Damono, Sapardi Djoko. Sosiologi Sastra Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas; Jakarta. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Depdikbud. 1979.
Danziger, Marlis K.and W Stacy Johnson. Literary Criticism. Massachusets. DC Head and Company. 1961.
Hughes, Kenney . An Article:Marriage and class structure in 19th century Britain, http//www.academic.britishhistory.cuny.edu/anglish/html
Endaswara, Suwardi. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: FBS UNY. 2003
.Guarein, W L, Et all, A Handbook of Critical Approach to Literature”, New York: Harper and Row Publisher.
Hough, Graham. An Essay on Criticism. Wiltshire: Duckworth Publisher.1973
Junus, Umar. Sosiologi Sastera. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementrian Pelajaran Malaysia. 1986
Kennedy, Mary Linch and Hadly M Smith, Academic Writing; Working with Sources Across the Curriculum. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Kenney, William. How to analyze Fiction. New York: Monarch Press. 1996
Laurenson, Diana and Alan Swingewood. The Sociology of Literature. London: Granada Publishing Limited. 1972.
Long, William J. History of English Literature. Ginn Publisher. NY: 1950. Newton, K M, Twentieeth Century Litterary Theory, London: Mc Millan, 1988.
MISDI, Misdi. BEYOND CRITICAL THINKING IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A DISCOURSE PERSPECTIVE. JURNAL BASIS, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 51-56, feb. 2018. ISSN 2527-8835. Available at: <http://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/basis/article/view/306
MUBARAK, zia hisni. AN ANALYSIS OF COHESION DEVICES IN POLITICAL NEWS OF THE JAKARTA POST: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS APPROACH. JURNAL BASIS, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 13-24, oct. 2014. ISSN 2527-8835. Available at: <http://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/basis/article/view/316>
Nyoman, K R, Teori, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra, 2004.
Robert, D Y, Litterature, Reading Fiction, Poetry and Drama, Compact Edition,
Boston Burr Ridge, New York.
Rugierro, Veronica and Jayme Diane, Short
Review: Amazon Book Reviewer. http//ww.amazon.com/gpl/dl/member-review/janeausten
Saini, K..Protes Sosial Dalam Sastra. Bandung. Angkasa, 1986.
Thomson, Janel, Sociology; Social class in Britain. London: Heinmann Ltd. 1982.
Tregidgo, PS. A Background to English . London: Longman. 1996
Wellek, Rene and Austen Waren. Theory of Literature. USA: US. Information Agency. 1995