ANALISI YURIDIS PENGATURAN JANGKA WAKTU NOTARIS DALAM MENERIMA DAN MENYIMPAN PROTOKOL NOTARIS DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Diki Zukriadi Universitas Putera Batam
  • Padrisan Jamba
  • Zuhdi Arman Universitas Putera Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v9i1.3700

Keywords:

Notary Protokol, time limit, legal consequences

Abstract

Notary Public is a public official who is authorized to make credential deeds as a means of proof. Besides being given a notary protokol, it is also obliged to save the notary protokol, both its own and other notary protokols. Regulations related to depository of notary protokol in article 65 paragraph (5) of the UUJN only state that the time for submission was issued 25 (twenty-five) years or more sent by the Notary recipient of the Notary Protokol to the Regional Supervisory Council. This can lead to legal considerations of the notary who will accept the protokol responsible for the notary protokol which is of great concern, which causes rejection of other notaries who will accept the protokol. This study uses a normative method with steps of description, systematization, and explanation of the content of positive law related to using laws and regulations, accessing history and obtaining concepts. Based on the results of the assessment and analysis, the notary protokol is not regulated by the exploitation in UUJN so as to make an agreement on the law so that it can keep documents on the notary protokol while he is still working and also open the work agreement by getting permission from the Notary Association Regional Supervisory Board. Indonesia. While it was agreed that there was a refusal to accept the notary protokol, legal considerations would be given to the notary recipient of the protokol. Tackling these responsibilities can be incorporated into codes of ethics, the notary profession, and approved by the government regarding sanctions for reprimands and compensation from membership.

References

Achmad Ali, 2008, Menguak Tabir Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Bahder Johan Nasution, 2016, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, cetakan Kedua, Mandar Maju,Bandung.
Ghansham Anand, 2012, Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia, Surabaya,
Habib Adjie, 2014, Merajut Pemikiran Dalam Dunia, Citra Aditya bakti, Bandung.
Habib adjie, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Citra Aditya bakti, Bandung.
Herlien Budiono, 2013, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Buku Kedua, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Munir Fuady, 2002, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Cetakan Kesatu, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2000, Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Dipandang Dari Sudut Hukum Perdata, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Salim H.S, 2015, Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu, Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta, Raja grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Tan Thong Kie, 2002, studi notariat, serba serbi praktek notaris, Jakarta
Van Apeldoorn, 1990, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
Zulkifli Amsyah, 2005. Manajemen Kearsipan, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Additional Files

Published

2021-11-27

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 1 April 2021

Section

Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 1 April 2021

License

License

As long as this article is in the process of submission, editor, reviewer, copyright and has not been rejected, then this article is still owned by the Law Study Program of Putera University, so the authors are prohibited from publishing this article in other journals. If the writing from the author has been rejected or has been archived then the author is given the opportunity to publish to other journals.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>